June 11, Adidas Limited ( women adidas ) v. Hua Chu (Quanzhou) Shoes Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Chinese pearl company), Adi Wang sporting goods (China) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Adi King Corporation) and individual business Qianmou registered trademark infringement and unfair competition case in Hubei Province, Wuhan City Intermediate People's Court 24 court hearing was heard. The original defendants were a lot of evidence submitted, the case processing time lasted nearly 2 days. It is understood that the first case, the defendant Qianmou stores in its business prominently used marked "Adi King", "adivon" a combination of text and graphic identity, store sales of shoes, clothing and other related products are also used identified above. The product manufacturers China Company and Adi King Corporation beads. According to Adidas alleged that Chinese companies and Adi Wang Zhu company is also extensive use of its website logo infringement, and carry out related business activities. In response, Adidas request Wuhan Intermediate People's Court ruling three of the accused such acts amount to a violation of trademark registration, the defendant used "Adi King" on the conduct constitutes unfair competition, and awarded 3 The defendant compensation for 500,000 yuan in economic losses. June 11 in the morning the trial scene, the main burden of proof from the Adidas company, three defendants to cross-examination. Adidas company submitted to the court for its "Adidas", "adidas" so the word mark and the "three bars" graphic mark in class 25 for clothing, shoes and other commodities have the exclusive right to prove that the defendant Use the "Adi King", "adivon" such as identity confusion caused by the fact that the relevant public, and demonstrate in court the evidence the accused infringing content. In the afternoon the main burden of proof by the three defendants. The defendant provided evidence that the company currently enjoys "adivon" word mark in class 25 goods of the exclusive right, and its "Adi King" enterprise name is approved by the relevant business sector registered its conduct did not constitute infringement. In evidence, cross-examination, the two sides on the part of the problem once the debate in court, the presiding judge had to remind both sides several times only three of the evidence to show that no debate. June 12, the case entered the court stage of the debate, the two sides mainly on the subject of rights, infringement and other facts and Panpei limit a debate. It is noteworthy that, in the trial process, the women adidas Adi King's infringement will be identified as "three bars", and Adi Wang argues that the company insisted identified as "F inverted triangle." After the trial, the court has not sentenced in court. Newspaper will continue to pay attention.
没有评论:
发表评论